Throughout history, even the most brilliant minds have frequently failed to accurately predict the trajectory of technological advancement. Time and again, statements dismissing ideas that later became pivotal innovations litter the historical record. Yet these failed predictions also offer invaluable lessons about anticipating the future in a domain as dynamic as technology. By examining this pattern of miscalculation through economic principles like Jevons Paradox and latent demand, we gain insight into why technological progress so often defies expert forecasts.
Look no further than the advent of computers and the internet for some of the most glaring oversights in technological prediction. Ken Olsen, founder of Digital Equipment Corporation, infamously stated in 1977 that no one would want a computer in their home. His view reflected the era’s prevailing notion that computers were predominantly for business or research settings. The personal computing revolution that would soon follow, putting a PC on every desk, was difficult to envision.
Experts also significantly underestimated the transformational impact of internet technology and digital communication. The 1961 FCC report dismissing communication satellites as impractical for telephone service and the Western Union memo calling the telephone an unviable invention seem comically shortsighted in retrospect. But they illustrate how easy it is to underestimate latent demand – demand that only surfaces once a new technology becomes readily available at scale.
Economic principles partly explain this pattern of miscalculation. Jevons Paradox describes how efficiency gains can actually increase demand and consumption of a resource, rather than decreasing it as one might expect. This frequently occurs with new technologies as increased efficiency unlocks new use cases. For example, as computing power became exponentially more efficient, it enabled the rise of the World Wide Web, mobile computing, artificial intelligence, and countless other latent demands that drove overall energy usage higher despite efficiency gains.
When a technology is initially developed, inventors and experts often struggle to anticipate the full spectrum of uses and applications that will emerge. They mistakenly assume demand is finite and predictable based on current limitations. In reality, new technologies often spawn emergent and unintended consequences. They transform behaviors, create new markets, and satisfy latent demands that only become apparent after widespread adoption.
Consider how personal computers developed from niche business tools to indispensable multi-purpose devices once computing power became cheap enough. Or how smartphone cameras and internet connectivity enabled social media and the gig economy – transformations unimaginable in the early days of the technology. The lack of imagination cuts both ways too. Lord Kelvin’s dismissal of x-rays and heavier-than-air flight as impossible soon crumbled in the face of rapid invention once the underlying knowledge was in place.
As with all exponential technologies, the accelerating pace of progress catches even the most informed observers off guard. Technical limitations that appear stubbornly insurmountable can dissolve in the face of sustained innovation. Problems considered AI-complete like chess or go were conquered by AI years before the experts predicted thanks to advances in machine learning. This highlights why linear extrapolation of current trends typically fails for forecasting technological change. We consistently underestimate the profundity of advances over the longer term.
Does this mean all technological prediction is doomed to failure? Not necessarily. But experts would be wise to approach such forecasts with humility. Recognizing the pitfalls from economic principles and history makes predictions more robust. Setting wide confidence intervals around estimates acknowledges the inherent uncertainty. Scenario planning considering best and worst cases is prudent. And instilling a vision that leaves room for surprise inventions can overcome rigid preconceptions.
With emerging fields like quantum computing, biotechnology, and AI, many momentous innovations surely lie ahead, though their exact nature remains nebulous. If the past is any guide, the true trajectory of progress will likely astonish even the most imaginative futurists. The human creativity that fuels invention easily outpaces notions of what is possible or desirable. But by studying previous miscalculations around technology, we gain perspective into this eternal quandary. Perhaps the wisest predictions acknowledge that the true pace and nature of advancement ultimately unfolds in remarkable and unexpected ways.
Comments